tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10890559.post863991943479872731..comments2023-10-11T00:32:23.731-07:00Comments on ChicagoGenealogy: Research Insights from Study and Serendipity: Census Search: City Directory ApproachChicagoGenealogyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16845802294693283275noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10890559.post-91522781640256804742010-12-16T09:23:55.965-08:002010-12-16T09:23:55.965-08:00Great point! Some Chicago street names and street ...Great point! Some Chicago street names and street numbers have changed over the years. The guides to the changes are available at ChicagoAncestors.org under the "Tools" tab.<br /><br />The 1909 renumbering wouldn't have affected this search though. I was trying to match a 1900 address to the 1900 census.ChicagoGenealogyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16845802294693283275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10890559.post-9804248908493079482010-12-13T04:04:16.635-08:002010-12-13T04:04:16.635-08:00The house number may have changed. There is a pla...The house number may have changed. There is a place online (can't remember which, but it is one of these: www.chicagoancesors.org or<br />www.alookatcook.com) that has a PFD directory of house numbers that were changed in 1909. And there are a lot of them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10890559.post-7980231232951316482010-09-30T21:05:34.677-07:002010-09-30T21:05:34.677-07:00After looking through the census as you did, I agr...After looking through the census as you did, I agree that 708 Melrose was missed. Looking at the 1900 City Directory, there is a Balduan Rohden Clothing Ctr h. 708 Melrose. He is definately not listed on the 1900 census.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com